Question: The Gemara in Berachot (6b) says: "One who brings joy to the bride and groom is as if he rebuilts
the ruins of Yerushalayim". If so,
why it is forbidden to get married during the Three Weeks, since we would be
rebuilding Yerushalayim?
Answer: Ha-Rav Avigdor
Nevenzal, Rav of the Old City, wrote me: "The Gemara in Shabbat (105b)
says that anyone who gets angry is as if he worships Avodah Zarah. Nevertheless, we do not stone one who gets
angry", meaning that it is "as if".
Ha-Rav Shlomo
Aviner, Nasi Yeshivat Ateret Yerushalayim, told me: "See the Gemara in Baba
Batra (60b) that after the destruction of the Temple, it would have been proper
not to get married, but this was rejected because then the seed of Avraham
would have died out. It is therefore at
least appropriate not to get married during the Three Weeks".
Ha-Rav Yitzchak
Zilberstein answered based on the explanation of the Chatam Sofer (Derush to 7th
of Av 5499) on the verse: "Hashem builds Yerushalayim, He will gather the
outcasts of Israel" (Tehilim 147:2).
He asks: Why does it say that Hashem "builds" Yerushalayim in
the present tense instead of in the future tense as in "will gather"?
The Chatam Sofer answers that our Sages say
that the Third Temple will descend in fire from Heaven already built (there is
a dispute whether will we will build the Temple or it will descend from Heaven –
M.T.), and it is built each and every year, by the crying and mourning of the
Jewish People over its destruction. It
therefore says that Hashem "builds" Yerushalayim in the present
tense, since He is constantly building it.
This is similar to the words of the Shelah
(Ta'anit Ot #33) that there is therefore no mourning on Shabbat, since the
mourning builds Yerushalayim, and the building of the Beit Ha-Mikdash does not
supercede Shabbat.
Based on this, it is clear why there are no
weddings during this time, since the mourning during the Three Weeks builds
Yerushalayim even more than weddings do (brought in "Vavei Ha-Amudim
Ve-Chishukeihem" of Rav Zilberstein, Gilyon #46, p. 115).
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.